4.0 Article

Spatial anxiety and self-confidence mediate sex/gender differences in mental rotation

期刊

LEARNING & MEMORY
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 312-320

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/lm.053596.122

关键词

-

资金

  1. Northern Ireland
  2. Northern Ireland and North East Doctoral Training Partnership (NINE DTP) [ES/P000762/1]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study found that the male advantage in mental rotation is the largest cognitive sex/gender difference in psychological literature. This study further investigated the impact of spatial anxiety and self-confidence on these gender differences.
A recent meta-synthesis study with a sample of >12 million participants revealed that the male advantage in mental rotation (MR) is the largest cognitive sex/gender difference found in psychological literature. MR requires test takers to mentally rotate three-dimensional cubic figures under time restrictions. Previous studies have investigated how biological and social factors contribute to cognitive sex/gender differences in tasks of this type. Spatial anxiety and self-confidence in MR tasks have received less attention. The present study investigated the contribution of these psychological factors to sex/gender differences in MR performance. Participants (n = 269) completed two MR tasks that differed in task difficulty. Participants also indicated their self-confidence (for each item) and spatial anxiety. The results revealed that pronounced sex/gender differences in spatial anxiety and self-confidence mediate sex/gender in MR performance, especially when task demands are high. The current findings suggest that task-irrelevant factors that are not spatial cognitive in nature contribute largely to the well-known medium to large sex/gender differences in MR. Future studies should further explore mechanisms underlying cognitive sex/gender differences within a biopsychosocial approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据