4.5 Article

Self-Sacrificial Template-Directed Synthesis of Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Porous Carbon for Energy-Storage Devices

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 668-674

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201500536

关键词

electrochemistry; hierarchical porosity; metal-organic framework; self-sacrificial template; two-dimensional carbons

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program 973 [2014CB239701]
  2. NSFC [21173120, 51372116]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011030, BK2011740, BK20151468]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of NUAA [NP2014403, NJ20140004]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  6. Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education [CXZZ13 0158]
  7. Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation in NUAA [BCXJ13-13]
  8. Foundation of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA [kfjj130219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived carbon materials exhibit large surface areas, but dominant micropore characteristics and uncontrollable dimensions. Herein, we propose a self-sacrificial template-directed synthesis method to engineer the porous structure and dimensions of MOF-derived carbon materials. A porous zinc oxide (ZnO) nanosheet solid is selected as the self-sacrificial template and two-dimensional (2D) nanostructure-directing agent to prepare 2D ZIF-8-derived carbon nanosheets (ZCNs). The as-prepared ZCN materials exhibit a large surface area with hierarchical porosity. These intriguing features render ZCN materials advanced electrode materials for electrochemical energy-storage devices, demonstrating large ion-accessible surface area and high ion-/electron-transport rates. This self-sacrificial template-directed synthesis method offers new avenues for rational engineering of the porous structure and dimensions of MOF-derived porous carbon materials, thus exploiting their full potential for electrochemical energy-storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据