4.5 Article

Resilient Yolk-Shell Silicon-Reduced Graphene Oxide/Amorphous Carbon Anode Material from a Synergistic Dual-Coating Process for Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 1446-1454

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201600254

关键词

anodes; graphene; lithium-ion batteries; mechanical properties; nanostructures

资金

  1. National Chung-Shan Institute of Science Technology [CSIST-0497-V303 (103)]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) [104-3113-E-011-002, 104-2923-M-011-002-MY3, 104-2911-I-011-505-MY2]
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) [104-EC-17-A-08-S1-183]
  4. Top University Projects of Ministry of Education (MOE) [100H451401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dual-coating process was developed to prepare a unique yolk-shell silicon-reduced graphene oxide/amorphous carbon (YS-Si@rGO/a-C) anode material. The nanostructured Si composite anode material consists of Si cores, evenly wrapped with a first coating of graphene oxide constructed through electrostatic self-assembly, and a shell of a second reinforced coating of graphene oxide/amorphous carbon, integrated by using an economic hydrothermal carbonization process. Thermal reduction and HF etching were then applied to reduce graphene oxide into graphene and to create the required void space to endow the hybrid material with sufficient mechanical strength and to buffer against stresses induced by volume changes of the Si nanoparticles. The obtained YS-Si@rGO/a-C composite anode material has structural integrity together with conductive 3D-network beneficial to its electrochemical performance, attributed to the synergy of electrostatic self-assembly and hydrothermal carbonization. As a result, the composite anode has a superior initial coulombic efficiency of 76%, surpassing other published Si/G composite anodes, as well as an initial cycle reversible capacity of 1668mAhg(-1) at 0.4Ag(-1) and a capacity retention of 75% after over 100 cycles, when compared with the yolk-shell structured Si@a-C anode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据