4.6 Article

Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm: An Evolutionary Computation Approach for Model Free Optimization

期刊

BIOMIMETICS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7040144

关键词

metaheuristic algorithm; swarm intelligence; egret swarm optimization algorithm; constrained optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. EPSRC
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. [62066015]
  5. [61962023]
  6. [61966014]
  7. [EP/V000756/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel meta-heuristic algorithm named Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm (ESOA) inspired by hunting behavior of two egret species. ESOA consists of three primary components: a sit-and-wait strategy, an aggressive strategy, and discriminant conditions, providing high efficiency and stability.
A novel meta-heuristic algorithm named Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm (ESOA) is proposed in this paper, which is inspired by two egret species' hunting behavior (Great Egret and Snowy Egret). ESOA consists of three primary components: a sit-and-wait strategy, aggressive strategy as well as discriminant conditions. The learnable sit-and-wait strategy guides the egret to the most probable solution by applying a pseudo gradient estimator. The aggressive strategy uses random wandering and encirclement mechanisms to allow for optimal solution exploration. The discriminant model is utilized to balance the two strategies. The proposed approach provides a parallel framework and a strategy for parameter learning through historical information that can be adapted to most scenarios and has well stability. The performance of ESOA on 36 benchmark functions as well as 3 engineering problems are compared with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Differential Evolution (DE), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO). The result proves the superior effectiveness and robustness of ESOA. ESOA acquires the winner in all unimodal functions and reaches statistic scores all above 9.9, while the scores are better in complex functions as 10.96 and 11.92.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据