4.7 Article

Geometric structure of thermal cones

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 106, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.064109

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Polish Science [POIR.04.04.00-00-17C1/18-00, DEC-2019/35/O/ST2/01049, 2021/03/Y/ST2/00193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The second law of thermodynamics introduces an asymmetry in the flow of events, known as the thermodynamic arrow of time. This leads to an ordering of the system's state space into past, future, and incomparable regions. In this study, we analyze the structure of thermal cones, which represent the states that a given state can evolve to (future thermal cone) or evolve from (past thermal cone) thermodynamically. We provide explicit constructions of the past thermal cone and the incomparable region for a classical system interacting with a heat bath, and analyze their behavior based on thermodynamic monotones.
The second law of thermodynamics imposes a fundamental asymmetry in the flow of events. The so-called thermodynamic arrow of time introduces an ordering that divides the system's state space into past, future, and incomparable regions. In this work, we analyze the structure of the resulting thermal cones, i.e., sets of states that a given state can thermodynamically evolve to (the future thermal cone) or evolve from (the past thermal cone). Specifically, for a d-dimensional classical state of a system interacting with a heat bath, we find explicit construction of the past thermal cone and the incomparable region. Moreover, we provide a detailed analysis of their behavior based on thermodynamic monotones given by the volumes of thermal cones. Results obtained apply also to other majorization-based resource theories (such as that of entanglement and coherence), since the partial ordering describing allowed state transformations is then the opposite of the thermodynamic order in the infinite temperature limit. Finally, we also generalize the construction of thermal cones to account for probabilistic transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据