4.0 Review

Diabetes and bone

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM
卷 66, 期 5, 页码 633-641

出版社

SBEM-SOC BRASIL ENDOCRINOLOGIA & METABOLOGIA
DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000552

关键词

Glucose; fracture; insulin; FRAX; diagnosis

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Foundation for Research Support (Fapesp) [2018/18071-5]
  2. Brazilian National Council for the Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [309316/2021-9]
  3. Fapesp [2021/03152-2]
  4. Faepa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis are common diseases that have mutual risk factors and influences. This review discusses the factors associated with increased risk of fractures in individuals with diabetes and explores the shared factors affecting the treatment of both diseases.
Globally, one in 11 adults has diabetes mellitus of which 90% have type 2 diabetes. The numbers for osteoporosis are no less staggering: 1 in 3 women has a fracture after menopause, and the same is true for 1 in 5 men after the age of 50 years. Aging is associated with several physiological changes that cause insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion, which in turn lead to hyperglycemia. The negative balance between bone resorption and formation is a natural process that appears after the fourth decade of life and lasts for the following decades, eroding the bone structure and increasing the risk of fractures. Not incidentally, it has been acknowledged that diabetes mellitus, regardless of whether type 1 or 2, is associated with an increased risk of fracture. The nuances that differentiate bone damage in the two main forms of diabetes are part of the intrinsic heterogeneity of diabetes, which is enhanced when associated with a condition as complex as osteoporosis. This narrative review addresses the main parameters related to the increased risk of fractures in individuals with diabetes, and the mutual factors affecting the treatment of diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022;66(5):633-41

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据