4.5 Article

A biocultural approach to navigating conservation trade-offs through participatory methods

期刊

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-13273-270343

关键词

biocultural approach; conservation; participatory forest management; participatory mapping; protected areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research explores how a biocultural approach can help understand and address trade-offs in protected area planning and management. By using participatory mapping and community visioning facilitation, this approach identifies geographic boundaries, resource-use patterns, and cultural relevance, enabling more meaningful community participation in the processes.
The desire to simultaneously address the well-being of local people while also mitigating the destruction of ecosystems resulted in a variety of win-win approaches, including popular models such as community-based conservation and integrated conservation and development projects. More than 25 years of international conservation experience show that win-win outcomes are decidedly mixed; there is a need to shift to a trade-off narrative to make these approaches more effective and sustainable. In this article we consider how a biocultural approach could provide relevant information to better understand and navigate trade-offs in protected area planning and management processes. Using these central tenets, this research uses participatory mapping methods to identify and document communities' physical and cultural landscapes and how they are connected. We then utilize community visioning facilitation to create a shared vision of participatory forest management. The results indicate that this approach can identify geographic boundaries and spatial biocultural resource-use patterns, uncover those resources' cultural relevance, and cultivate a foundation for more meaningful participation for communities in the protected area planning and management processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据