4.3 Article

Strigolactone regulates shoot development through a core signalling pathway

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 1806-1820

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.021402

关键词

Shoot branching; Signal transduction; Strigolactone

类别

资金

  1. European Research Council [294514 - EnCoDe]
  2. Gatsby Charitable Foundation [GAT3272C]
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council via the European Research Area Plant Genomics programme [R1039101]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council PhD Program (Sichuan Agricultural University)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactones are a recently identified class of hormone that regulate multiple aspects of plant development. The DWARF14 (D14) alpha/beta fold protein has been identified as a strigolactone receptor, which can act through the SCFMAX2 ubiquitin ligase, but the universality of this mechanism is not clear. Multiple proteins have been suggested as targets for strigolactone signalling, including both direct proteolytic targets of SCFMAX2, and downstream targets. However, the relevance and importance of these proteins to strigolactone signalling in many cases has not been fully established. Here we assess the contribution of these targets to strigolactone signalling in adult shoot developmental responses. We find that all examined strigolactone responses are regulated by SCFMAX2 and D14, and not by other D14-like proteins. We further show that all examined strigolactone responses likely depend on degradation of SMXL proteins in the SMXL6 clade, and not on the other proposed proteolytic targets BES1 or DELLAs. Taken together, our results suggest that in the adult shoot, the dominant mode of strigolactone signalling is D14-initiated, MAX2-mediated degradation of SMXL6-related proteins. We confirm that the BRANCHED1 transcription factor and the PIN-FORMED1 auxin efflux carrier are plausible downstream targets of this pathway in the regulation of shoot branching, and show that BRC1 likely acts in parallel to PIN1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据