4.7 Article

Authigenic clays as precursors to carbonate precipitation in saline lakes of Salar de Llamara, Northern Chile

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00658-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the associations between microbial communities, Mg-clay minerals, and carbonates in microbial mat samples from the Puquios in the Atacama Desert. It finds micrometer-scale aggregates of nanocrystalline Mg-clay around cyanobacterial cell sheaths and throughout alveolar networks of microbial extracellular polymeric substances. High-Mn calcite is found occupying pore spaces and surfaces within the clay matrix. The study suggests that the formation of authigenic clays is important for the preservation of microbial communities and the precipitation of carbonates in non-marine settings such as saline lakes.
The Salar de Llamara, Atacama Desert is host to saline lakes known as Puquios, which are possible analogs for lakes on early Earth or Mars. Here we examine associations between microbial communities, Mg-clay minerals, and carbonates in microbial mat samples from the Puquios using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, focused ion beam nanotomography, and transmission electron microscopy. We observe micrometer-scale aggregates of nanocrystalline Mg-clay around cyanobacterial cell sheaths and throughout alveolar networks of microbial extracellular polymeric substances. High-Mn calcite occupies pore spaces and surfaces within the clay matrix. We propose a sequence whereby extracellular polymeric substance networks serve as surfaces for precipitation of Mg-clay, which permineralizes the original microorganisms. Formation of the clay reduces kinetic barriers and provides a suitable substrate for the formation of carbonate minerals. We therefore suggest that authigenic clays are important in the preservation of microbial communities and the precipitation of carbonates in non-marine settings such as the saline lakes of the Atacama Desert.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据