4.0 Article

Genetic Algorithm-Based Challenging Scenarios Generation for Autonomous Vehicle Testing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JRFID.2022.3223092

关键词

Automated driving; intelligent testing; simulation; genetic algorithm; scenes generation

资金

  1. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2020B0909050003]
  2. Guangdong Rural Science and Technology Correspondent Foundation [KTP20200221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Virtual testing plays a crucial role in developing connected and automated vehicles, with the proposed genetic algorithm-based framework addressing the issue of data scarcity and showing effectiveness in generating challenging scenarios.
Virtual testing plays a vital role in developing connected and automated vehicles. To ensure the safety of CAV, millions of miles of testing are required. The scenario library defines the parameter of each testing scenario, which reduces testing by merging similar scenarios and focusing on challenging scenarios. However, current scenario generation methods still bear some disadvantages, such as lack of data and low efficiency. In order to overcome the lack of data, this paper proposed a genetic algorithm-based framework for the cut-in event and car-following event. In this study, the genetic algorithm searches for one of the most challenging scenarios within the boundaries. The challenging scenario is acquired by the brute force search algorithm which searches from the start scenario. The result shows the ratio of accident scenarios to challenging scenarios in our scenario set is more than 40%. Compared with natural driving data scenarios, our method performs well without natural driving data. In addition, the genetic algorithm converges in ten iterations which indicates its efficiency and suitability in scenario generation. More specifically, whole challenging scenarios which probably occur in the real world are collected in the scenario set.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据