4.6 Article

Optical Properties of Crystalline Thin Films of the Organic Laser Gain Material 4,4′-Bis[(N-carbazole)styryl]biphenyl

期刊

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 375-380

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01401

关键词

organic crystals; organic thinfilm crystals; organic semiconductors; ampliied spontaneous emission; organic laser dyes; organic photonics

资金

  1. DFG [WA 4719/2-1]
  2. Hector Fellow Academy
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [MA 3342/6-1, EXC 1056]
  4. EU [730872]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201806750012]
  6. German Excellence Initiative through the Wuerzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence [EXC 1056, EXC 2147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the preparation of BSB-Cz thin-film crystals using a simple vacuum deposition method followed by thermal annealing. The resulting crystalline neat films exhibit high photoluminescence quantum yield and superior optical stability, providing a potential route for advancing organic laser devices.
Enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield and excellent transport associated with molecular order are important for advancing organic laser device performance. However, materials combining excellent quantum yield and transport are rare. 4,4 '- Bis[(N-carbazole)styryl]biphenyl (BSB-Cz) has been heavily inves-tigated as a promising material for laser devices. However, research on highly ordered BSB-Cz crystalline films is lacking, despite the much better transport properties to be expected. Here, we show that BSB-Cz thin-film crystals can be prepared using a simple vacuum deposition method, followed by thermal annealing. The resulting crystalline neat BSB-Cz thin films show a very high photoluminescence quantum yield of over 85% and superior optical stability compared to amorphous BSB-Cz films under intense pumping conditions. We believe that our work provides a route for advancing organic laser devices through introducing crystallinity in emitter thin films with a scalable approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据