3.9 Article

Underneath the Purple Stain

期刊

HERITAGE
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 4100-4113

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/heritage5040212

关键词

parchment; purple stains; measles; NGS; biodeterioration

资金

  1. HERCULES Laboratory, Evora University [CEECIND/02598/2017]
  2. FCT/MCTES [UIDB/04449/2020, UIDP/04449/2020, UIDB/50006/2020, UIDP/50006/2020]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN) [RYC2019-026885-I]
  4. FCT [CEECIND/01147/2017, PTDC/ART-HIS/29522/2017]
  5. Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) [PIE_20214AT021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Alcobacenses is an important collection of Monastic codices in Portugal. A heavily deteriorated codex (ALC.338) with purple stains on the margins and fungal and bacterial biofilms was analyzed, revealing the presence of Saccharopolyspora sp. and Malassezia sp. as the predominant bacterial and fungal genera. Further studies and comparisons were discussed.
The Alcobacenses are one of the most important Portuguese collections of Monastic codices. During a campaign study to further advance our knowledge on this important legacy and its state of conservation, a heavily deteriorated codex (ALC.338) stood out due to the presence of purple stains on the lower margins on virtually all folios. In some of them, the purple stains are accompanied by yellow and brown patches as well. Also noticed was the presence of these purple spots on the white tawed leather covering the codex. The codex was analyzed macro and microscopically, chemically and biologically using state-of-the-art technology such as next-generation sequencing. The biological deterioration associated with the appearance of these purple spots arises from the inside out and reveals significant abundance of the bacterial genus Saccharopolyspora sp., which accounted for 86% of the bacterial genera identified. For the fungal population, the most common genus was Malassezia sp. Visual inspection of the sample confirmed the presence of fungal and bacterial biofilms. Pressing questions, comparison to similar studies and future perspectives are also given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据