4.6 Article

New Control Strategy for Heating Portable Fuel Cell Power Systems for Energy-Efficient and Reliable Operation

期刊

MACHINES
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/machines10121159

关键词

control strategies; environmental conditions; fuel cell; heating strategies; hydrogen; portable device; power system reliability; testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates heating strategies for fuel cells in low-temperature environments and finds that appropriate operational strategies can ensure reliable and energy-efficient operation. The heating strategy should be adjusted according to environmental conditions to optimize efficiency and reliability.
Using hydrogen fuel cells for power systems, temperature conditions are important for efficient and reliable operations, especially in low-temperature environments. A heating system with an electrical energy buffer is therefore required for reliable operation. There is a research gap in finding an appropriate control strategy regarding energy efficiency and reliable operations for different environmental conditions. This paper investigates heating strategies for the subfreezing start of a fuel cell for portable applications at an early development stage to enable frontloading in product engineering. The strategies were investigated by simulation and experiment. A prototype for such a system was built and tested for subfreezing start-ups and non-subfreezing start-ups. This was done by heating the fuel cell system with different control strategies to test their efficiency. It was found that operating strategies to heat up the fuel cell system can ensure a more reliable and energy-efficient operation. The heating strategy needs to be adjusted according to the ambient conditions, as this influences the required heating energy, efficiency, and reliable operation of the system. A differentiation in the control strategy between subfreezing and non-subfreezing temperatures is recommended due to reliability reasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据