4.3 Article

Multiscale simulation-guided design of enzyme bioconjugates with enhanced catalysis

期刊

CHEM CATALYSIS
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 2691-2703

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.09.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army Research Office MURI grant [W911NF1410263]
  2. US National Science Foundation [MCB-1932984]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [GM-109045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biopolymer scaffold modification is widely used to enhance enzyme catalysis. However, predicting the effects of scaffold position on enzyme properties is a central challenge. Researchers have developed a computational-experimental approach to model the effects of DNA scaffold position on enzyme kinetics and have found that the conjugation position is as important as the scaffold's chemistry and structure. They also discovered that there is a significant enhancement in enzyme kinetics when the scaffold is positioned at a suitable distance from the active site.
Biopolymer scaffold modification is widely used to enhance enzyme catalysis. A central challenge is predicting the effects of scaffold position on enzyme properties. Here, we use a computational-experimental approach to develop a model for the effects of DNA scaffold position on enzyme kinetics. Using phosphotriesterase (PTE) modified with a 20-bp dsDNA, we demonstrate that conjugation position is as important as the scaffold's chemistry and structure. Multiscale simulations predict the effective substrate concentration increases close to the scaffold, which has mM strength binding to the substrate. Kinetic analysis shows that the effective concentration that the scaffold provides is best utilized when positioned next to, but not blocking, the active site. At similar to 5-A degrees distance between scaffold and active site, a 7-fold increase in k(cat)/K-M was achieved. A model that accounts for the substrate concentration as well as PTE-DNA geometry accurately captures the kinetic enhancements, enabling prediction of the effect across a range of DNA positions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据