4.6 Review

Adaptive Facades: Review of Designs, Performance Evaluation, and Control Systems

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12122112

关键词

adaptive facade; evaluation; control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the factors hindering the growth of the market share of adaptive facades (AFs) by examining designs, evaluation criteria and tools, and control systems. Insufficient commercial technology, inaccurate and incomplete performance data, and inconsistent evaluation criteria are identified as the main factors that have hindered the widespread utilization of AFs. Future research tendencies include reducing costs, retrofitting existing building facades, developing building performance measurement tools, and building consensus evaluation criteria that favor the wide applicability of such facades in actual practice.
Adaptive building envelope systems can manage energy and mass transformation between indoor and outdoor environments, which contributes to the achievement of environmental benefits via reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission while maintaining human comfort and well-being. However, the market penetration of adaptive facades (AFs) is far from sufficient, even though their capabilities have been recognized in research. Hence, this paper explores the factors hindering the growth of the market share of AFs, based on an exhaustive examination of designs, evaluation criteria and tools, and control systems. Insufficient commercial technology, inaccurate and incomplete performance data, and inconsistent evaluation criteria are demonstrated to be the factors that have hindered the widespread utilization of AFs thus far. Future research tendencies, including reducing costs, retrofitting existing building facades, developing building performance measurement tools, and building consensus evaluation criteria that favor the wide applicability of such facades in actual practice are identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据