3.8 Article

Association between magnesium intake and cognition in US older adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011 to 2014

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12250

关键词

cognitive function; magnesium intake; older adults; race; ethnicity; serum vitamin D; sex

资金

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health
  2. [U54MD006882]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found a positive association between higher magnesium intake and improved cognition in older adults, particularly among non-Hispanic Whites and those with sufficient levels of serum vitamin D.
IntroductionIdentifying nutrition- and modifiable lifestyle-based risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia may contribute future primary prevention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between magnesium intake and cognition in older adults in the United States. MethodsBased on the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2014, the study included 2508 participants aged 60 years and older. Linear regression models were used to examine the association of total magnesium intake with cognition. ResultsAfter adjusted demographic and other confounding factors, intakes of energy and total calcium, and serum vitamin D level, higher intake of total magnesium was independently associated with 0.15 higher global cognitive z-score (95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.28 for highest vs. lowest quartile, P trend = .037). The positive association of total magnesium intake with global cognition was primarily presented among women, non-Hispanic Whites, and those with sufficient serum vitamin D levels (>= 50 nmol/L), although interactions were not significant. There were no clear linear associations for global cognition with serum vitamin D level. DiscussionsOur findings suggest that high magnesium intake alone may improve cognition in older adults, particularly among non-Hispanic Whites and subjects with sufficient levels of serum vitamin D. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据