3.8 Article

Early Alzheimer's disease-like reductions in gray matter and cognitive function with aging in nonhuman primates

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12284

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; magnetic resonance imaging; non-human primate; vervet; working memory

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30 AG049638, T32AG033534, P40-OD010965, P30 AG021332, R24AG073199, UL1TR001420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the relationship between age, cognitive performance, and neuroanatomy in vervet monkeys. The results showed that age was negatively associated with cortical gray matter volume and temporal-parietal cortical thickness. Additionally, cortical gray matter volumes predicted working memory performance. This study provides a foundation for future investigations into the early diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
IntroductionAge-related neuropathology associated with sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) often develops well before the onset of symptoms. Given AD's long preclinical period, translational models are needed to identify early signatures of pathological decline. MethodsUsing structural magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive assessments, we examined the relationships among age, cognitive performance, and neuroanatomy in 48 vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) ranging from young adults to very old. ResultsWe found negative associations of age with cortical gray matter volume (P = .003) and the temporal-parietal cortical thickness meta-region of interest (P = .001). Additionally, cortical gray matter volumes predicted working memory at approximately 1-year follow-up (correct trials at the 20s delay [P = .008]; correct responses after longer delays [P = .004]). DiscussionCortical gray matter diminishes with age in vervets in regions relevant to AD, which may increase risk of cognitive impairment. This study lays the groundwork for future investigations to test therapeutics to delay or slow pathological decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据