4.0 Article

Varicose Vein Stripping in 66,577 patients in 11 years in public hospitals in Sao Paulo

期刊

REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA
卷 68, 期 12, 页码 1657-1662

出版社

ASSOC MEDICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220565

关键词

Big data; Varicose veins; Database; Epidemiology; Vascular diseases

资金

  1. Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program (PIBIC) - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) , Brazil [800996/2018-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the epidemiology of varicose vein stripping in Brazil's largest city, Sao Paulo. The majority of patients treated were female adults. Over the course of 11 years, a total of 66,577 varicose vein surgeries were performed, with an increasing trend over the years.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of varicose vein stripping in Brazil's largest city, Sao Paulo.METHODS: Open and anonymous data regarding varicose vein surgeries between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated from the TabNet platform of the Municipal Health Secretary of Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: Most patients were female and adults. A total of 66,577 varicose vein surgeries were performed in public hospitals and outpatient clinics in Sao Paulo, with a statistically significant increase for both unilateral (p=0.003) and bilateral (p<0.001) procedures. Since 2016, unilateral procedures have been performed more frequently than bilateral procedures. Most procedures were associated with same-day (54.8%) or next-day (32%) discharge. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.0045%. The total amount reimbursed was $20,693,437.94, corresponding to a mean value of $310.82 per procedure.CONCLUSION: Surgeries to treat chronic vein disease totaled 66,577 in 11 years, demanding $20,693,437.94 from the public health system. The majority of treated patients were female, over 40 years of age, and local residents. Procedure rates have increased over the years. The in-hospital mortality rate was very low (0.0045%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据