4.0 Article

The Global Burden of Lead Toxicity Attributable to Informal Used Lead-Acid Battery Sites

期刊

ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 686-699

出版社

UBIQUITY PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.10.015

关键词

informal economy; lead poisoning; low- and middle-income countries; soil pollution; disability adjusted life years; recycling

资金

  1. European Commission
  2. International Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

B A C K G R O U N D Prior calculations of the burden of disease from environmental lead exposure in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have not included estimates of the burden from lead-contaminated sites because of a lack of exposure data, resulting in an underestimation of a serious public health problem. O B J E C T I V E We used publicly available statistics and detailed site assessment data to model the number of informal used lead-acid battery (ULAB) recyclers and the resulting exposures in 90 LMICs. We estimated blood lead levels (BLLs) using the US Environment Protection Agency's Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children and Adult Lead Model. Finally, we used data and algorithms generated by the World Health Organization to calculate the number of attributable disability adjusted life years (DALYs). R E S U L T S We estimated that there are 10,599 to 29,241 informal ULAB processing sites where human health is at risk in the 90 countries we reviewed. We further estimated that 6 to 16.8 million people are exposed at these sites and calculate a geometric mean BLL for exposed children (0-4 years of age) of 31.15 mg/dL and a geometric mean BLL for adults of 21.2 mg/dL. We calculated that these exposures resulted in 127,248 to 1,612,476 DALYs in 2013. C O N C L U S I O N S Informal ULAB processing is currently causing widespread lead poisoning in LMICs. There is an urgent need to identify and mitigate exposures at existing sites and to develop appropriate policy responses to minimize the creation of new sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据