4.3 Article

Cisplatin versus gemcitabine as concurrent chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma cervix: A comparative study of clinical response and toxicities

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 1518-1524

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1184_20

关键词

Carcinoma cervix; cisplatin; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide and the third most common cancer in India. This study compared the treatment response and toxicities of cisplatin and gemcitabine as concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. The results showed that cisplatin had a better treatment response, but gemcitabine had more hematological toxicity and cisplatin had more gastrointestinal toxicity. The skin toxicities were comparable.
Cervical cancer ranks as the four leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in India. Most patients present in advanced stages. Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the treatment response and hematological, gastrointestinal, and skin toxicity of cisplatin versus gemcitabine as concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted from February 2017 to August 2018. Sixty patients of squamous cell carcinoma cervix with Stage IIB to IIIB were randomly allocated to either weekly gemcitabine (observation arm) 150 mg/m(2) or cisplatin (control arm) in the dose of 35 mg/m(2) along with concurrent radiotherapy. Treatment response and toxicities of both drugs were evaluated. Results: Gemcitabine arm has more Grade 2 (23.3% vs. 10%) and Grade 3 (3.3% vs. none) hematological toxicity as compared to cisplatin arm. For gastrointestinal toxicity, Grade 2 toxicity was observed more in cisplatin arm (23.3%) as compared to 13.3% in gemcitabine arm. Skin toxicity was found to be insignificant. There was complete response of 86.7% in cisplatin arm, while 73.3% in gemcitabine arm. Conclusion: Cisplatin has a better treatment response as compared to gemcitabine as concomitant chemotherapy agent with external beam radiation therapy. Hematological toxicity was more in gemcitabine arm and gastrointestinal toxicity was more in cisplatin arm. The skin toxicities were comparable in both the arms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据