期刊
PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 23, 页码 -出版社
AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.235106
关键词
-
资金
- Simons Foundation via the Simons Collaboration on the Many Electron Problem
- NSF [DMR-1944974]
- Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [BES-ERCAP0020359]
This study compares twist-averaging and the dynamical cluster approximation variant of the dynamical mean field theory, and compares them to the standard periodic boundary technique. It is found that while all methods converge to the same limit, the convergence speed differs in practice. Embedding theories are shown to be effective in managing finite size effects.
Simulations of extended quantum systems are typically performed by extrapolating results of a sequence of finite-system-size simulations to the thermodynamic limit. In the quantum Monte Carlo community, twistaveraging was pioneered as an efficient strategy to eliminate one-body finite size effects. In the dynamical mean field community, cluster generalizations of the dynamical mean field theory were formulated to study systems with nonlocal correlations. In this work, we put the twist-averaging and the dynamical cluster approximation variant of the dynamical mean field theory onto equal footing, discuss commonalities and differences, and compare results from both techniques to the standard periodic boundary technique. At the example of Hubbardtype models with local, short-range and Yukawa-like longer range interactions we show that all methods converge to the same limit, but that the convergence speed differs in practice. We show that embedding theories are an effective tool for managing both one-body and two-body finite size effects, in particular if interactions are averaged over twist angles.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据