4.5 Article

A Dual-Ion Battery Constructed with Aluminum Foil Anode and Mesocarbon Microbead Cathode via an Alloying/Intercalation Process in an Ionic Liquid Electrolyte

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 3, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600605

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302238]
  2. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2013C090]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2014A010105032, 2015A010106008]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030310226]
  5. Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project [JSGG20150602143328010, JCYJ20150401145529042]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570737]
  7. Hong Kong Scholars Program [XJ2015048]
  8. Scientific Equipment Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [yz201440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel dual-ion battery constructed with aluminum foil anode and mesocarbon microbead (MCMB) cathode based on a lithium-salt containing ionic liquid electrolyte is prepared. The working mechanism of this Al-MCMB dualion battery is demonstrated to be intercalation/deintercalation of anions into/from the MCMB cathode and AlLi alloying/dealloying at the Al anode. Owing to the good stability of ionic liquid at high working voltage and the protection of fluoroethylene carbonate additive in the electrolyte by forming stable solid electrolyte interphase film on the Al foil, the battery presents superior cycling stability at high cut-off voltage of 4.8 V with a reversible capacity of 98 mAh g(-1) after 300 cycles at 0.5 C with negligible decay. Moreover, as the Al foil is directly utilized as both anode material and current collector, the energy density of the packaged Al-MCMB cell can be further increased, which is estimated to be 221 W h kg(-1) at the power density of 109 W kg(-1) and remains 185 W h kg(-1) at 1141 W kg(-1), much better than most commercial lithium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据