4.7 Article

Remarks on the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality in relativistic quantum field theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  4. CNPq [301030/2019-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality within a relativistic quantum field theory model. A set of bounded Hermitian operators is introduced using Weyl operators, and a CHSH-type correlator is constructed and evaluated. Although the violation of the CHSH inequality is small compared to Tsirelson's bound in quantum mechanics, the model can be used to study Bell's inequalities in more physical cases such as the Higgs models.
We present an investigation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality within a relativistic quantum field theory model built up with a pair of free massive scalar fields o phi A; phi B thorn where, as is customary, the indices oA; B thorn refer to Alice and Bob, respectively. A set of bounded Hermitian operators is introduced by making use of the Weyl operators. A CHSH-type correlator is constructed and evaluated in the Fock vacuum by means of canonical quantization. Although the observed violation of the CHSH inequality turns out to be rather small as compared to Tsirelson's bound of quantum mechanics, the model can be employed for the study of Bell's inequalities in the more physical case of gauge theories such as the Higgs models, for which local Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) invariant operators describing both the massive gauge boson as well as the Higgs particle have been devised. These operators can be naturally exponentiated, leading to BRST invariant type of Weyl operators useful to analyze Bell's inequalities within an invariant BRST environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据