3.9 Article

Ultrasonographic Detection and Surgical Retrieval of a Nonmetallic Twinkle Marker in Breast Cancer: Pilot Study

期刊

RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220053

关键词

Ultrasonography; US-Doppler; Breast; Localization; Surgery

资金

  1. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  2. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Department of Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the short-term safety and comparability of a nonmetallic twinkle marker to standard breast biopsy clips and radioactive seeds in terms of their visibility on color Doppler ultrasound. The results demonstrate that the twinkle marker is easily identifiable and has comparable safety and detection ease to the biopsy clip, suggesting its potential for clinical use.
Purpose: To evaluate the short-term safety of a nonmetallic twinkle marker and compare its conspicuity at color Doppler US with that of standard breast biopsy clips and radioactive seeds by using B-mode US in axillary lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: This prospective study (November 2020-July 2021) of participants with node-positive breast cancer who completed chemotherapy involved placing a twinkle marker at the time of preoperative radioactive seed localization. A five-point scoring system (1 = easiest, 5 = most difficult) was used to rate the ease of identifying the clip, seed, and twinkle marker on postlocalization sonograms, mammograms, specimen radiographs, and gross pathologic specimens. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Eight women (mean age, 57 years +/- 16 [SD]) were enrolled. The median scores for US conspicuity of each device were 3.9 (range, 3.7-5.0) for the radioactive seed, 2.4 (range, 1.0-5.0) for the clip, and 2.0 (range, 1.0-4.3) for the twinkle marker. In six of eight participants, the twinkle marker was the most identifiable at US. The seeds, clips, and twinkle markers were scored very easy to identify on seven of eight postlocalization mammograms. The surgeon retrieved all eight twinkle markers 1-3 days after localization. In all 16 interpretations, the seeds, clips, and twinkle markers were rated as very easy to identify on specimen radiographs. The clip was the most difficult device to identify at pathologic examination in all participants, and the twinkle marker was the easiest to identify in seven of eight participants. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that the safety and ease of US detection of a twinkling tissue marker may be comparable to a biopsy clip. (c) RSNA, 2022

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据