4.6 Article

Classical and quantum metrology of the Lieb-Liniger model

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.062442

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. [2017R1A2A2A050 01422]
  3. [2020R1A2C2008103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the classical and quantum Fisher information of the interaction coupling in the Lieb-Liniger model, with a focus on the dependence on system size and interaction strength.
We study the classical and quantum Fisher information of the interaction coupling in the Lieb-Liniger model. Fisher information has been studied extensively when the parameter is inscribed on a quantum state by a unitary process, e.g., Mach-Zehnder or Ramsey interferometry. Here we investigate the case that a Hamiltonian parameter to be estimated is imprinted on eigenstates of that Hamiltonian and thus is not necessarily encoded by a unitary operator. We take advantage of the fact that the Lieb-Liniger model is exactly soluble for both periodic and hard-wall boundary conditions. For the latter case, we provide a derivation of the explicit expression for the norm of the Lieb-Liniger wave function. The Fisher information is determined for various small numbers of particles, for both ground state and excited states of type I and type II in the Lieb-Liniger terminology. We discuss the dependence of the Fisher information on interaction strength and system size, to further evaluate the metrological aspects of the model. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that the Fisher information displays a maximum when we vary the system size, indicating that the distinguishability of the wave functions is largest when the Lieb-Liniger parameter is at the crossover between Bose-Einstein condensate and Tonks-Girardeau limits. The saturability of this Fisher information by employing standard absorption imaging as the measurement method is assessed by a specific modeling of the latter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据