4.6 Article

True Yellow Light-Emitting Diodes as Phosphor for Tunable Color-Rendering Index Laser-Based White Light

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 2089-2095

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00457

关键词

nanowire; visible laser; titanium; molecular beam epitaxy; yellow; light-emitting diode; solid-state lighting

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) [KACST TIC R2-FP-008]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [BAS/1/1614-01-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An urgent challenge for the lighting research community is the lack of efficient optical devices emitting in between 500 and 600 nm, resulting in the green-yellow gap. In particular, true green (similar to 555 nm) and true yellow (similar to 590 nm), along with blue and red, constitute four technologically important colors. The III-nitride material system, being the most promising choice of platform to bridge this gap, still suffers from high dislocation density and poor crystal quality in realizing high-power, efficient devices. Particularly, the high polarization fields in the active region of such 2D quantum confined structures prevent efficient recombination of carriers. Here we demonstrate a true yellow nanowire (NW) light emitting diode (LED) with peak emission of 588 nm at 29.5 A/cm(2) (75 mA in a 0.5 X 0.5 mm(2) device) and a low turn-on voltage of similar to 2.5 V, while having an internal quantum efficiency of 39%, and without efficiency droop up to an injection current density of 29.5 A/cm(2). By mixing yellow light from a NW LED in reflective configuration with that of a red, green, and blue laser diode (LD), white light with a correlated color temperature of similar to 6000 K and color-rendering index of 87.7 was achieved. The nitride-NW-based device offers a robust, long-term stability for realizing yellow light emitters for tunable color-rendering index solid-state lighting, on a scalable, low-cost, foundry-compatible titanium/silicon substrate, suitable for industry uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据