3.8 Article

Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 341-352

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1932296820951829

关键词

diabetes; neuromodulation; neuropathy; pain; painful diabetic neuropathy; pharmacotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common complication of chronic diabetes, and pain control remains challenging and unmet needs exist. Anticonvulsants and antidepressants are first-line treatments, while the use of oral opioids is discouraged. Neuromodulation treatment methods also show potential.
The development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of chronic diabetes that can be associated with significant disability and healthcare costs. Prompt symptom identification and aggressive glycemic control is essential in controlling the development of neuropathic complications; however, adequate pain relief remains challenging and there are considerable unmet needs in this patient population. Although guidelines have been established regarding the pharmacological management of PDN, pain control is inadequate or refractory in a high proportion of patients. Pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants (pregabalin, gabapentin) and antidepressants (duloxetine) are common first-line agents. The use of oral opioids is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and can also lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Their use is therefore discouraged. There is an emerging role for neuromodulation treatment modalities including intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Furthermore, consideration of holistic alternative therapies such as yoga and acupuncture may augment a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This aim of this review is to focus on the current management strategies for the treatment of PDN, with a discussion of treatment rationale and practical considerations for their implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据