4.5 Review

Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera

期刊

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 171-182

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-016-0579-4

关键词

Papilionoidea; Hesperioidea; Urbanization; Urban ecology; Literature review

资金

  1. Direccion General del Instituto de Ecologia, A.C. through the Proyectos de Investigacion de Alto Valor Estrategico para la Sociedad
  2. CONACYT [213179/244461 290649]
  3. Educational Condonable Credit by COLCIENCIAS [568-2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human migration to urban centers has resulted in diverse environmental disturbances that affect biodiversity. Although urbanization has been highlighted as one of the main drivers of biodiversity endangerment, this topic is still poorly studied in many countries. In order to establish the status quo of the ecology of butterflies in urban centers, we gathered publications focused on urban butterflies (Lepidoptera). We compiled a total of 173 studies from 37 countries and more than 110 urban areas, including published papers and theses (1956-2015). Most papers (69 %) addressed ecological topics, 14 % were focused on biological conservation, and 17 % corresponded to species lists. In summary, most studies revealed a negative impact of urbanization intensity on butterfly diversity (richness and abundance). In fact, we found studies reporting local extinctions due to urbanization, highlighting the causes related to them. The study of charismatic urban wildlife groups, such as butterflies, is a promising field, as there are still important gaps in our comprehension of the ecological patterns and processes that occur in urban areas. Undoubtedly, understanding the response of butterflies to urbanization will aid in the development of urban biodiversity management, planning, and conservation strategies worldwide, which together with knowledge of other wildlife groups and socioeconomic variables, will lead us to more sustainable, livable, and biodiverse cities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据