4.6 Article

Structure Evolution of Chemically Degraded ZIF-8

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 23, 页码 9736-9741

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c022179736

关键词

-

资金

  1. UNCAGE-ME, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012577]
  2. UNCAGE-ME
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Early Career Research Program [KC040602, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management
  5. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure of metal-organic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF8) to humid SOx gas results in framework disorder and decreased pore accessibility. The disorder exhibits critical behavior with respect to water concentration, and the cleavage of linkers is correlated to microstrain. The structure transformation is homogeneously nucleated.
Exposure of the metal-organic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF8) to humid SOx gas cleaves Zn-N bonds, leading to framework disorder and a corresponding decrease in pore accessibility. This work shows that framework disorder exhibits a critical behavior with respect to water concentration in the gas stream. While the quantity of sulfate adsorbed at Zn nodes is at or below the detection threshold for the X-ray pair distribution function technique, precluding direct observation of the adsorbate, powder diffraction reveals clear structural alterations. The onset of linker cleavage correlates to a large microstrain that diminishes as framework disorder increases. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy shows that the sulfur distribution throughout representative grains is uniform, implying the structure transformation is homogeneously nucleated and not dependent upon gas diffusion kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据