4.6 Article

Microscopic theory of excitons bound by light

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.205414

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Coun- cil Center of Excellence in Future Low -Energy Electronics Technologies
  2. Australian Research Council Fu- ture Fellowships
  3. [CE170100039]
  4. [FT200100619]
  5. [FT160100244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We theoretically investigate the scenario of a semiconductor quantum well in a microcavity, where optically excited electron-hole pairs can form exciton polaritons via the exchange of microcavity photons rather than Coulomb interactions. Using a diagrammatic theory, we determine the spectral response of the semiconductor microcavity and obtain the conditions under which an exciton is bound by photon exchange. Our results are in good agreement with a recent experiment on doped quantum wells.
We theoretically investigate the scenario of a semiconductor quantum well in a microcavity, where the band structure is arranged such that optically excited electron-hole pairs cannot form Coulomb-bound excitonic states. However, it is still possible to form exciton polaritons (part-light, part-matter quasiparticles), where the excitons are bound via the exchange of microcavity photons rather than via Coulomb interactions. Using a diagrammatic theory, we determine the spectral response of the semiconductor microcavity, which includes exciton-polariton resonances as well as a continuum of unbound electron-hole pairs. Our method also gives us access to the photon fraction and the electron-hole wave function of the exciton polariton. In particular, we obtain the conditions under which an exciton is bound by photon exchange and we show that Coulomb interactions can enhance binding at large cavity photon frequencies. Our results for the spectral response are in good agreement with a recent experiment on doped quantum wells [E. Cortese et al., Nat. Phys. 17, 31 (2021)].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据