4.1 Article

Repair of partial thickness cartilage defects using cartilage extracellular matrix membrane-based chondrocyte delivery system in human Ex Vivo model

期刊

出版社

KOREAN TISSUE ENGINEERING REGENERATIVE MEDICINE SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s13770-016-9043-z

关键词

Partial thickness cartilage defect; Cartilage extracellular matrix membrane; Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Cartilage repair

资金

  1. grant of Korea Health Technology R&D Project through Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C1632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment options for partial thickness cartilage defects are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the chondrocyte-seeded cartilage extracellular matrix membrane in repairing partial thickness cartilage defects. First, the potential of the membrane as an effective cell carrier was investigated. Secondly, we have applied the chondrocyte-seeded membrane in an ex vivo, partial thickness defect model to analyze its repair potential. After culture of chondrocytes on the membrane in vitro, cell viability assay, cell seeding yield calculation and cell transfer assay were done. Cell carrying ability of the membrane was also tested by seeding different densities of cells. Partial defects were created on human cartilage tissue explants. Cell-seeded membranes were applied using a modified autologous chondrocyte implantation technique on the defects and implanted subcutaneously in nude mice for 2 and 4 weeks. In vitro data showed cell viability and seeding yield comparable to standard culture dishes. Time dependent cell transfer from the membrane was observed. Membranes supported various densities of cells. Ex vivo data showed hyaline-like cartilage tissue repair, integrated on the defect by 4 weeks. Overall, chondrocyte-seeded cartilage extracellular membranes may be an effective and feasible treatment strategy for the repair of partial thickness cartilage defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据