4.0 Article

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BIRTH WEIGHT, BREASTFEEDING AND DIGIT RATIO WITH PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND PHYSICAL FITNESS IN SCHOOL ADOLESCENTS

期刊

KINESIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 316-324

出版社

UNIV ZAGREB, FAC KINESIOLOGY
DOI: 10.26582/k.54.2.13

关键词

physical fitness; adolescents; birth weight; breastfeeding

资金

  1. Directorate General for Innovation and Teacher Training of the Ministry of Education of Andalusia [PIV-034/18, PIV-021/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze the isolated and combined effects of non-modifiable factors on adolescents' physical fitness. The results showed that breast milk intake and its prediction power did not have an impact on physical fitness. Birth weight was related to certain physical fitness indicators, while the 2D:4D ratio did not have a significant effect on physical fitness. The non-modifiable factors studied in relation to physical activity practically ceased to be significant when other variables were introduced into the models.
This study aimed to analyze the isolated and combined effects of non-modifiable factors on adolescents' physical fitness. This cross-sectional, descriptive study involved 1475 adolescents, aged 12 to 19 years, of whom 721 were girls, from four public schools in southern Spain. Physical activity, birth weight and breastfeeding time, and physical fitness were assessed. To calculate the 2D:4D ratio, three separate measurements of the length of the index finger (2D) and ring finger (4D) of both hands were taken. Results show no differences in the intake of breast milk nor its prediction power for physical fitness. Birth weight was related to horizontal jump and manual dynamometry results, while the 2D:4D ratio was not significant in the linear regression models. The non-modifiable factors studied in relation to physical activity practically ceased to be significant when variables such as sex, body mass index and physical activity practice were introduced into the models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据