4.4 Article

Investigation of gas metal arc welding process parameters of aluminium alloy weldment using Taguchi-grey-fuzzy integrated approach

期刊

SCIENTIA IRANICA
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 3084-3097

出版社

SHARIF UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.24200/sci.2022.60003.6545

关键词

Optimization; Taguchi L-16 array; Grey relational technique; Fuzzy logic; GMAW; Aluminium alloy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the effect of process parameters of Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) on the weld quality of aluminium alloy. An integrated Taguchi-grey-Fuzzy approach is used to find optimized process parameters and discuss the effects of process parameters on weld joints.
Globally, aluminium alloys are used in many industries. Application of aluminium alloys is realized by many manufacturing processes in which joining processes are inevitable. Joining of aluminium alloys is achieved by various welding processes. One of the appropriate welding processes used to join aluminium alloy is Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW). This paper investigates the effect of process parameters of the GMAW process while welding AA 6351 aluminium alloy weldment with the help of an integrated Taguchi-grey-Fuzzy approach. Taguchi L-16 array was designed by using an orthogonal method to conduct the experiments. From the experimental results, Signal-to-Noise ratios (S/N ratio) were calculated from which Grey Relational Grades (GRG) were computed. These computed GRG were used as input for the fuzzy controller to find the Grey Fuzzy Relational Grades (GFRG), by which optimized process parameters were found and validated. Furthermore, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to identify the contributions of the GMAW process parameters over the responses. Subsequently, the effects of process parameters on the weldments were also discussed in detail. By identifying the optimized process parameters and contributing process parameters, the quality of weld joints is improved. (c) 2022 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据