4.4 Article

Optimum structural design of spatial truss structures via migration-based imperialist competitive algorithm

期刊

SCIENTIA IRANICA
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 2995-3015

出版社

SHARIF UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.24200/sci.2022.59344.6188

关键词

Hybrid algorithm; Imperialist competitive algorithm; Biogeography-based optimization; Metaheuristic algorithms; Optimum design; Truss structures design; Structural optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new hybrid algorithm, Migration-Based Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (MBICA), which combines the advantageous features of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) and Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) to establish an effective search technique. Compared to other methods, MBICA converges faster and achieves better solutions in structural optimization.
The current study presents a new hybrid algorithm generated by combining advantageous features of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) and Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) to establish an effective search technique. Although the ICA performs fairly well at the exploration phase, it is less effective at the exploitation stage. In addition, its convergence speed is problematic in some instances. Meanwhile, the migration operator of BBO method strongly emphasizes the local search to find the optimum solution more precisely. The combination of these two algorithms generates a robust hybrid algorithm that enjoys both exploratory and exploitative functionalities. The proposed hybrid algorithm is called Migration-Based Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (MBICA). To validate its performance, MBICA is used to optimize a variety of benchmark truss structures. Compared to some other methods, this algorithm converges to better or at least identical solutions by reducing the required number of structural analyses. Finally, the results from the standard BBO, ICA, and other recently developed metaheuristic optimization methods were compared with those obtained in this study. (c) 2022 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据