3.8 Article

The Fight with Gradovsky: Causes and Consequences

期刊

出版社

PETROZAVODSK STATE UNIV
DOI: 10.15393/j10.art.2022.6421

关键词

F. M. Dostoevsky; Pushkin's Speech; A. D. Gradovsky; polemics; Slavophilism; Westernism; the people; Russia; Europe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The speech and response between lawyer and publicist A. D. Gradovsky and F. M. Dostoevsky in 1880 on the topic of the relationship between the people and the intelligentsia is a significant part of Russian thought. Their divergence stemmed from their different views on the role of the intelligentsia and the people in the country's history and future. Gradovsky saw the intelligentsia as educators while viewing the people as passive, while Dostoevsky emphasized the active nature of popular ideals and called for understanding and listening to the people.
The speech of the lawyer and publicist A. D. Gradovsky against F. M. Dostoevsky's Pushkin Speech, as well as the latter's response in the Diary of a Writer in 1880, occupy a prominent place in the golden fund of Russian thought. For the first time, a study of the background of this episode has been undertaken. In 1869-1878, Gradovsky was an ally of Dostoevsky, but in 1879 he already became his opponent. The main reason for this divergence is their different approaches to the problem of the relationship between the people and the intelligentsia, their role in the country's history, in its present and future. Gradovsky's position was reduced to the value of the intelligentsia as educators, with its progressive efforts being supported by the state, while the people were viewed as passive material. Dostoevsky, on the contrary, insisted on the active, effective nature of popular ideals, hence his call to hear and understand his people - the key goal set in the January 1881 Diary of a Writer, which became the last remark of the Russian thinker in this dispute. An article by A. D. Gradovsky The Answer to G. Dostoevsky, written between August 12 and 20, 1880, but not published, is published for the first time in the appendix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据