4.6 Article

Oesophagectomy following noncurative endoscopic resection for oesophageal carcinoma: does interval matter?

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac565

关键词

Oesophageal cancer; Endoscopic resection; Oesophagectomy; Interval

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [21Y31900104]
  2. Industry-University-Research Projects of Shanghai University Teachers
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Clinical and Translational Science by Chinese Ministry of Education Shanghai
  4. Technology Transfer Promotion Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [ZT202113]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine [20181816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to explore the effect of interval between noncurative endoscopic resection (ER) and subsequent oesophagectomy on pathologic stage and prognosis in oesophageal cancer patients. The results showed that a longer interval was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS), suggesting that oesophagectomy should be performed within 1 month after ER. Older age, T1b stage, lymphovascular invasion, and interval over 30 days were identified as significant risk factors for pathologic upstage and worse outcome.
OBJECTIVES: Oesophagectomy was always recommended after noncurative endoscopic resection (ER). And the optimal time interval from ER to oesophagectomy remains unclear. This study was to explore the effect of interval on pathologic stage and prognosis.METHODS: We included 155 patients who underwent ER for cT1N0M0 oesophageal cancer and then received subsequent oesophagectomy from 2009 to 2019. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed to find an optimal cut-off of interval from ER to oesophagectomy. In addition, pathologic stage after ER was compared to that of oesophagectomy. Logistic regression model was built to identify risk factors for pathological upstage.RESULTS: The greatest difference of DFS was found in the groups who underwent oesophagectomy before and after 30 days (P = 0.016). Among total 155 patients, 106 (68.39%) received oesophagectomy within 30 days, while 49 (31.61%) had interval over 30 days. Comparing the pathologic stage between ER and oesophagectomy, 26 patients had upstage and thus had worse DFS (hazard ratio = 3.780, P = 0.042). T1b invasion, lymphovascular invasion and interval > 30-day group had a higher upstage rate (P = 0.014, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). And they were independent risk factors for pathologic upstage (odds ratio = 3.782, 4.522 and 2.844, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: It was the first study exploring the relationship between time interval and prognosis in oesophageal cancer. The longer interval between noncurative ER and additional oesophagectomy was associated with a worse DFS, so oesophagectomy was recommended performed within 1 month after ER. Older age, T1b stage, lymphovascular invasion and interval > 30 days were significantly associated with pathologic upstage, which is related to the worse outcome too.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据