4.5 Review

Pharmacological effects of statins in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 101, 期 51, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032313

关键词

endothelial dysfunction; endothelium; inflammation; statins; type 2 diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) [121496, 107519]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the effect of statins on endothelial function in adults with type 2 diabetes and explore whether these biomarkers are ideal therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.
Background:Due to contradicting findings on impact of statins on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus especially across the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). With this systematic review, we aim to evaluate whether the use of statins improves endothelial function in adults with type 2 diabetes. We will further highlight if these biomarkers are ideal therapeutic targets for risk for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Methods:This protocol was carried out according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols-2015 guideline. The online databases, such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Sciences, will be targeted using the medical subject heading terms (MeSH) and text words. The review will include clinical studies on the effect of statins on markers of endothelial function in type 2 diabetes. The Cochrane risk of bias guideline will be used to assess the quality and risk of bias. We are planning to use the grading of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation approach to evaluate the strength and quality of evidence. Results:This study will not involve human samples and patient data; hence ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be presented in journal clubs and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据