4.3 Review

Sarcopenia and bone health: new acquisitions for a firm liaison

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1759720X221138354

关键词

bone-muscle crosstalk; genetics; osteoporosis; osteosarcopenia; sarcopenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcopenia is a condition characterized by the simultaneous presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia, and it is caused by dysfunctions in the bone-muscle unit. While there are still gaps in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, exercise and nutrition interventions have been found to be essential in combating osteosarcopenia.
Osteosarcopenia (OS) is a newly defined condition represented by the simultaneous presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia, the main age-related diseases. The simultaneous coexistence of the two phenotypes derives from the close connection of the main target tissues involved in their pathogenesis: bone and muscle. These two actors constitute the bone-muscle unit, which communicates through a biochemical and mechanical crosstalk which involves multiple factors. Altered pattern of molecular pathways leads to an impairment of both the functionality of the tissue itself and the communication with the complementary tissue, composing the OS pathogenesis. Recent advances in the genetics field have provided the opportunity to delve deeper into the complex biological and molecular mechanisms underlying OS. Unfortunately, there are still many gaps in our understanding of these pathways, but it has proven essential to apply strategies such as exercise and nutritional intervention to counteract OS. New therapeutic strategies that simultaneously target bone and muscle tissue are limited, but recently new targets for the development of dual-action drug therapies have been identified. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the latest scientific evidence associated with OS, a complex disorder that will pave the way for future research aimed at understanding the bone-muscle-associated pathogenetic mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据