4.5 Article

Improving the mechanical properties and thermal stability of sodium alginate/hydrolyzed collagen films through the incorporation of SiO2

期刊

CURRENT RESEARCH IN FOOD SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 96-101

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.012

关键词

Biopolymer; Sustainable film; Mechanical properties; Food packaging

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Brazil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of adding nano-SiO2 on the structure, thickness, mechanical properties, and thermal stability of sodium alginate/hydrolyzed collagen blend films. The results showed that the addition of nano-SiO2 improved the overall mechanical and thermal behavior of the films, increasing tensile strength and elongation at break. This research provides potential performance enhancement for these films as sustainable packaging materials.
Biopolymer-based films have become leading alternatives to traditional fossil-based packaging plastics. Among the countless types of biopolymers with potential for such applications, films containing hydrolyzed collagen in their composition were scarcely explored. This study determined the effect of different loads of nano-SiO2 (0, 2, 6, 8 and 10% w/w of sodium alginate) in the sodium alginate (SA) and hydrolyzed collagen (HC) blend films in terms of structure, thickness, mechanical properties, and thermal stability. The results indicated an improvement in the general mechanical and thermal behavior. Tensile strength increased from 18.2 MPa (control sample) to 25.4 MPa for the SA/HC film incorporated with 10% nano-SiO2. In the same condition, the film's elongation at break improved impressively (from 19.5 to 35.8%). Thermal stability improved slightly for all proportions of nano-SiO2. Therefore, the addition of nano-SiO2 can be an easy and simple strategy to improve crucial properties of SA/HC blend films, increasing its performance for future application as sustainable packaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据