4.4 Article

Ixazomib Combined With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for POEMS Syndrome: A Case Report and Meta-Analysis

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15330338221123634

关键词

POEMS syndrome; autologous stem cell transplantation; ixazomib; meta-analysis; case report

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

POEMS syndrome, a rare monoclonal plasma cell disorder, currently lacks a unified treatment. This study conducted a meta-analysis and found that Ixazomib combined with ASCT therapy may be a safe and effective treatment method.
Objective: Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes (POEMS) syndrome is a rare monoclonal plasma cell proliferation disorder. At present, there is no unified treatment for POEMS syndrome. Here, we describe one case with POEMS syndrome with obvious neurological symptoms diagnosed in September 2020. We made a meta--analysis to assess the efficacy of treatment strategies in recent years. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the diagnosis and treatment of this patient, and searched relevant articles in PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases using MedicalSubject Headings (MeSH) (eg, POEMS, Therapy, Drug Therapy, Biological Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Immunotherapy, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Chemoradiotherapy, and Salvage Therapy) and free words, and performed the statistical analysis. Results: The patient's efficacy evaluation was complete response (CR) after treatment with ixazomib combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Overall, 20 articles consist of 6 clinical trials, 14 retrospective studies, and 936 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in complete hematologic response (CRH) rate between people who underwent ASCT and those who did not. However, ASCT might have a better survival rate. Conclusions: Ixazomib combined with ASCT therapy may be a safe and effective method for patients with POEMS syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据