3.8 Proceedings Paper

Wafer-Level Aging of InGaAs/GaAs Nano-Ridge p-i-n Diodes Monolithically Integrated on Silicon

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/IRPS48227.2022.9764597

关键词

Monolithic integration; Nano-ridge engineering; Stress-induced degradation; Silicon photonics; III-V p-i-n diode

资金

  1. imec's industrial affiliation R&D program on Optical I/O

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports for the first time a reliability study on degradation of InGaAs/GaAs nano-ridge p-i-n diodes monolithically integrated on Si by nano-ridge engineering (NRE). The results show that current crowding and Joule heating near the p-contact are responsible for the degradation in forward bias region, while the electrical stress-induced leakage current indicates the degradation of crystal quality in reverse bias region. The study also demonstrates that a sintering process can lower the p-contact resistance and improve electrical stability, and the high aspect-ratio of the trenches leads to effective threading dislocation trapping.
For the first time, a reliability study on degradation of InGaAs/GaAs nano-ridge p-i-n diodes monolithically integrated on Si by nano-ridge engineering (NRE) is reported. Wafer-level constant current stress in forward bias shows a gradual power law aging of both forward and dark current. Current crowding and Joule heating near the p-contact are responsible for the degradation in forward bias region. Indications of defect formation and Ti diffusion at the metal/GaAs interface are witnessed. The electrical stress-induced leakage current builds up at reverse bias region, pointing to the degradation of crystal quality. A sintering process lowers the p-contact resistance and improves electrical stability. The high aspect-ratio of the trenches leads to effective threading dislocation trapping: no dislocations have been observed to penetrate the active region during the 5000s stress time. This early work sheds light on realizing electrically robust GaAs diodes on Si and reliable monolithic lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据