4.2 Article

Single-pollen genotyping to estimate mode of unreduced pollen formation in Citrus tamurana cv. Nishiuchi Konatsu

期刊

PLANT REPRODUCTION
卷 29, 期 1-2, 页码 189-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00497-016-0277-7

关键词

FDR; 2n gamete; Heterozygosity; Hyuganatsu; SDR

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24688003]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24688003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2n pollen formed by FDR in citrus. The Japanese local citrus cultivar, Nishiuchi Konatsu (Citrus tamurana hort. ex Tanaka; NK hereafter), has the ability to produce unreduced 2n pollen grains, allowing generation of polyploid progenies via sexual polyploidization. In this study, we developed a method of single-pollen genotyping for citrus and applied it to the analysis of transmission of heterozygosity in NK 2n pollen grains. Heterozygosity transmission was expressed as the percentage inheritance of a set of heterozygous alleles from the parent to the 2n gamete. The pathway of 2n pollen development was investigated by applying the observed heterozygosity transmission and genetic distance to two different map functions, for first division restitution (FDR) and second division restitution (SDR). The fit of the values observed for both functions was calculated, while virtually moving the centromere position. We screened for six heterozygous SSR (codominant microsatellite marker loci) in NK, all of which were expected to lie within the same linkage group. Pollen germination prior to DNA extraction was essential for this work, and 6-h incubation proved to be optimal for subsequent PCR amplification. Single-pollen genotyping unreduced NK 2n pollen grains revealed that heterozygosity transmission exceeded 50 % in all six alleles, and fitness tests indicated that the FDR map function better fitted the heterozygosity transmission observed rather than the SDR function. Our data thus strongly indicate that 2n pollen in NK is a result of first division restitution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据