4.8 Article

High-performance hybrid supercapacitors based on self-supported 3D ultrathin porous quaternary Zn-Ni-Al-Co oxide nanosheets

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 475-485

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.049

关键词

Oxide nanosheet; Porous electrode; Hybrid supercapacitors; Transition metal oxides; Three-dimensional structures

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [CityU 11216815]
  2. NSAF [U1330132]
  3. US National Science Foundation [DMR-1410320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed transition metal oxides with hierarchical, porous structures, constructed from interconnected nano-building blocks, are considered promising positive electrodes for high-performance hybrid supercapacitors. Here we report our findings in design, fabrication, and characterization of 3D hierarchical, porous quaternary zinc-nickel-aluminum-cobalt oxide (ZNACO) architectures assembled from well aligned nanosheets grown directly on nickel foam using a facile and scalable chemical bath deposition process followed by calcination. When tested as a binder-free electrode in a 3-electrode configuration, the ZNACO display high specific capacity (839.2 C g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) and outstanding rate capability (similar to 82% capacity retention from 1 A g(-1) to 20 A g(-1)), superior to those of binary-component NiCo2O4 and ZnCo2O4 as well as single-component Co3O4 electrode. More remarkably, a hybrid supercapacitor consisting of an as-fabricated ZNACO positive electrode and an activated carbon negative electrode exhibits a high energy density of 72.4 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 533 W kg(-1) while maintaining excellent cycling stability (similar to 90% capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles at 10 A g(-1)), demonstrating a promising potential for development of high-performance hybrid supercapacitors. Further, the unique electrode architecture is also applicable to other electrochemical systems such as batteries, fuel cells, and membrane reactors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据