4.8 Article

Laser fabrication of all-solid-state microsupercapacitors with ultrahigh energy and power based on hierarchical pore carbon

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 90-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.012

关键词

Microsupercapacitors; Laser micromachining; All-solid-state cells; Activated mesophase pitch

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [104-2221-E-006-231-MY3, 104-2221-E-006-234-MY3, 104-3113-E-006-005, 104-3113-E006-011-CC2]
  2. Ministry of Education, Taiwan
  3. Aim for the Top University Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microsupercapacitors (MSCs) are used as power sources or energy storage units in microelectronic devices. This study fabricates all-solid-state MSCs using a laser for the micromachining of substrates coated with activated mesophase pitch (aMP) to produce in-plane interdigitated microelectrodes for use in conjunction with gel-state electrolytes. Due to the inclusion of hierarchically-connected micropores and mesopores, aMP carbon has considerable capability for charge storage and the delivery of energy at high rates. Through reduction in the finger width, the proposed laser-patterned design substantially reduces the resistance to ion drift in the electrolyte bulk and ion diffusion across the carbon-film network. The use of an ionogel enables the MSC to reach stack capacitance of 12 F cm(-3), stack energy of 16 mW h cm(-3), and stack power of 160 W cm(-3). These energy and power values approach those obtained from thin-film lithium ion batteries and aluminum electrolytic capacitors, respectively; this synergy between high energy and power is unprecedented for MSCs. The proposed MSCs exhibit outstanding cycling stability and those using ionogel present high thermal stability. The proposed fabrication methods enable the on-chip integration of microelectronic devices and therefore provide an opportunity for the development of a variety of micro/nano-sized energy devices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据