3.9 Article

Transcriptome of Lung Cancer Cells Resistant to the Cytotoxic Activity of Macrophages

期刊

DOKLADY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 507, 期 1, 页码 312-317

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S160767292205009X

关键词

non-small cell lung cancer; tolerance; cytotoxicity; macrophage; RNA-seq

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-15-00291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study obtained and characterized lung cancer cells resistant to the cytotoxic action of macrophages for the first time, and identified the genes associated with these observed changes. Understanding the mechanisms of tumor cell resistance to the cytotoxic activity of macrophages and its manifestation in a tumor environment is critically important for improving the effectiveness of existing cancer treatment methods and developing novel tumor immunotherapy methods.
The role of the immune system in tumor progression has been the subject of research for more than 100 years since Paul Ehrlich hypothesized that the presence of the immune system limits the occurrence of cancer. One of the mechanisms hindering the initiation and progression of the tumor is the cytotoxic activity of macrophages; however, in some cases, it is not sufficient to control tumorigenesis. This may be due to both the development of resistance of tumor cells to the antitumor activity of macrophages and the development of a tolerant phenotype of macrophages that do not have sufficient antitumor activity. In this work, the lung cancer cells resistant to the cytotoxic action of macrophages were obtained and characterized for the first time, and the genes associated with the observed changes were identified. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance of tumor cells to the cytotoxic activity of macrophages and the peculiarities of its manifestation in a tumor environment is critically important for improving the effectiveness of the existing methods of cancer treatment and developing novel methods for tumor immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据