4.6 Article

Miniaturized Rotary Actuators Using Shape Memory Alloy for Insect-Type MEMS Microrobot

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi7040058

关键词

microrobot; rotary actuator; shape memory alloy; artificial neural networks; MEMS; heat conduction

资金

  1. Nihon University Academic Research Grant [14-002]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [25420226]
  3. Research Center for Micro Functional Devices of Nihon University
  4. VLSI Design and Education Center (VDEC)
  5. University of Tokyo
  6. Synopsys, Inc.
  7. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
  8. Mentor Graphics, Inc.
  9. Nihon University College of Science and Technology Project Research
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25420226] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although several types of locomotive microrobots have been developed, most of them have difficulty locomoting on uneven surfaces. Thus, we have been focused on microrobots that can locomote using step patterns. We are studying insect-type microrobot systems. The locomotion of the microrobot is generated by rotational movements of the shape memory alloy-type rotary actuator. In addition, we have constructed artificial neural networks by using analog integrated circuit (IC) technology. The artificial neural networks can output the driving waveform without using software programs. The shape memory alloy-type rotary actuator and the artificial neural networks are constructed with silicon wafers; they can be integrated by using micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) technology. As a result, the MEMS microrobot system can locomote using step patterns. The insect-type MEMS microrobot system is 0.079 g in weight and less than 5.0 mm in size, and its locomotion speed is 2 mm/min. The locomotion speed is slow because the heat of the shape memory alloy conducts to the mechanical parts of the MEMS microrobot. In this paper, we discuss a new rotary actuator compared with the previous model and show the continuous rotation of the proposed rotary actuator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据