4.3 Article

Movements and activity levels of juvenile American lobsters Homarus americanus in nature quantified using ultrasonic telemetry

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 551, 期 -, 页码 155-170

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11721

关键词

American lobster; Homarus americanus; Juvenile; Ultrasonic telemetry; Movement; Behaviour; Activity

资金

  1. CFI (New Opportunities program)
  2. NBIF
  3. NSERC (Discovery program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we expand the size range of American lobsters Homarus americanus tracked in nature by quantifying for the first time the movements and activity levels of juveniles using ultrasonic telemetry. Ten individuals 20-47 mm carapace length (approximate to 1-4 yr old) were tracked for 21 d in August 2010 on a shallow nursery ground in southwest Bay of Fundy, Canada, using the Vemco VRAP tracking system. Many of our results are consistent with the literature on juvenile lobster ecology, which is largely based on laboratory experiments and short-term field observations. For example, the juvenile lobsters were significantly more active at night (71% of all activity) than during the day (29%), and they behaved as central place foragers, displaying movements that greatly limited their dispersal from the nursery habitat. However, the average amount of time individuals spent outside of shelter (approximate to 2.2-32.7% of each day, or 0.5-7.8 h) and the average size of their daily home ranges (approximate to 27.4-111.6 m(2)) did not increase with increasing body size, as was predicted based upon the literature. We also report for the first time evidence of a tidal (12.4 h) cycle of activity in juvenile lobsters, which was displayed more consistently at night than during the day. This study advances our understanding of the behavioural ecology of juvenile lobster on nursery grounds, and it suggests that these young individuals spend more time outside of shelters than might currently be concluded from the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据