4.3 Article

Patterns of larval settlement preferences and post-settlement survival for seven Caribbean corals

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 548, 期 -, 页码 127-138

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11688

关键词

Facilitation; Coral recruitment; Resilience; Larval ecology; Crustose coralline algae

资金

  1. Hunterdon Oceanographic Research fund
  2. Caribbean Coral Reef Ecosystems (CCRE) program at the Smithsonian Institution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caribbean coral reefs continue to decline in coral cover; however, recruitment is a natural process that could increase coral abundance. Benthic habitats that increase coral recruitment are a key factor for coral persistence, but very little is known about habitat selectivity for larvae of most species of corals. The larval settlement preferences and post-settlement survival of 3 brooding and 4 broadcast spawning coral species were compared in this study. The crustose coralline algae Titanoderma prototypum and Hydrolithon boergesenii facilitated larval settlement more than the biofilm control for the broadcast spawning corals but not for the majority of the brooding corals. In paired choice experiments, the larvae of all 7 corals preferred T. prototypum over Paragoniolithon solubile, and 6 of them preferred H. boergesenii over Pa. solubile, the exception being larvae of Porites astreoides. All corals equally preferred T. prototypum and H. boergesenii, except Pseudodiploria strigosa, which preferred T. prototypum, and Acropora palmata, which preferred H. boergesenii. Some recruits from the 3 brooding corals survived longer than 1 yr in the field, but of the 4 spawning corals, only P. strigosa had 2 recruits that survived >1 yr. Corals that spawned their gametes had increased settlement in the presence of a few species of coralline algae, but corals that brooded their larvae settled on biofilms and had much greater post-settlement survival, suggesting that the recruitment of brooding corals will dominate on reefs without facilitating species of crustose coralline algae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据