4.0 Article

Symptom Frequency, Intensity, and Distress in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema

期刊

LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 78-87

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2015.0027

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS/NIH [UL1 TR000445]
  2. Vanderbilt School of Nursing Martha Rivers Ingram Chair of Nursing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with lower limb lymphedema experience symptoms of pain, swelling, tightness, and heaviness in their legs. Less is known of the intensity and distress associated with these symptoms. This study sought to identify and compare the symptoms and the level of intensity and distress associated with symptoms by type of lymphatic disruption. Methods and Results: A cross-sectional design was used. Patients completed an online survey that included: a demographic form, the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Leg, and an open-ended question. The most prevalent symptoms were swelling, concerns about looks, heaviness, tightness, fatigue, and reduced physical activity. Statistically significant differences were found among groups in coldness in legs (chi(2)((df=3)) = 9.0, p = 0.03), lack of confidence in self (chi(2)((df=3)) = 10.6, p = 0.014), and feeling less sexually attractive (chi(2)((df=3)) = 12.6, p = 0.049). Group differences were also observed in the intensity of heaviness (chi(2)((df=3)) = 9.11, p = 0.03), numbness, (chi(2)((df=3)) = 10.66, p = 0.014), achiness (chi(2)((df=3)) = 12.40, p = 0.006), skin flakiness (chi(2)((df=3)) = 13.22, p = 0.004), and lack of interest in sex (chi(2)((df=3)) = 8.95, p = 0.030). Statistically significant group differences were not found in distress related to symptoms. Conclusions: Despite the number of symptoms reported by patients with lower-limb lymphedema, only a few statistically significant differences in symptoms and level of intensity were observed by type of lymphatic disruption. No statistically significant group differences were found in the distress level associated with any of the symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据