4.0 Article

Neogene Regional Scale of the Eastern Paratethys, Stratigraphy and Paleontological Basis

期刊

PALEONTOLOGICAL JOURNAL
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 1557-1720

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0031030122120024

关键词

Miocene; Pliocene; mollusks; foraminifers; nannoplankton; organic-walled phytoplankton; ichthyofauna; terrestrial vegetation; paleomagnetism; cyclostratigraphy

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-17-00047, 19-77-10075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article revises the stratigraphic scale of the Eastern Paratethys based on a study of the Neogene stratotype and reference sections, providing new data on regional subdivisions and their correlation with the Central Paratethys and Mediterranean stratotypes. It also discusses the history of identification, biotic characteristics, and stratigraphic methods, as well as the main results of the stratigraphic scheme revision.
The stratigraphic scale of the Eastern Paratethys is revised based on a study of the Neogene stratotype and reference sections, their biotic characteristics, and paleomagnetic and sedimentological data. New data on the correlation of its regional subdivisions with the Central Paratethys and Mediterranean stratotypes are presented. The section Regional Stage Scale of the Eastern Paratethys considers the history of identification and a brief description of the horizons of the regional scale, which later became regional stages, as well as their historical stratotypes and lectostratotypes, and division into Beds and Substages. The section History of Separate Biota Groups provides reviews on the most important groups of fauna, phytoplankton, and terrestrial vegetation, as well as on magnetostratigraphy, the possibility of correlation and dating of sections based on these data, and comparison with the Central Paratethys and stratotypes of the Mediterranean. In conclusion, the main results of the revision of the stratigraphic scheme of the Neogene of the Eastern Paratethys are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据